Arts & Opinion.com
Arts Culture Analysis
Vol. 25, No. 2, 2026
 
Current Issue
Back Issues
About
Podcasts

Submissions
Subscribe
Comments
Letters
Contact
Jobs
Ads
Links

Editor
Robert J. Lewis
Senior Editor
Jason McDonald
Contributing Editors
Louis René Beres
David Solway
Nick Catalano
Robert Lyon
Chris Barry
Howard Richler
Gary Olson
Jordan Adler
Andrew Hlavacek
Daniel Charchuk
Music Editor
Serge Gamache
Arts Editor
Lydia Schrufer
Graphics
Mady Bourdage
Photographer Jerry Prindle
Chantal Levesque
Webmaster
Emanuel Pordes

Past Contributors
Noam Chomsky
Mark Kingwell
Charles Tayler
Naomi Klein
Bruce Bawer
Arundhati Roy
Evelyn Lau
Stephen Lewis
Robert Fisk
Margaret Somerville
Mona Eltahawy
Michael Moore
Julius Grey
Irshad Manji
Richard Rodriguez
Navi Pillay
Ernesto Zedillo
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Jean Baudrillard
Bill Moyers
Barbara Ehrenreich
Leon Wieseltier
Nayan Chanda
Charles Lewis
John Lavery
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
Alex Waterhouse-Hayward

SO MUCH TROUBLE IN THE WORLD

Robert Lyon

by
ROBERT LYON

______________________________________________________

Robert Lyon is a retired clergyman who divides his time between Guelph, Ontario and Melaque, Mexico. He taught high school English, Latin, Greek and science, and served as an officer in the Canadian Armed Forces Reserve, retiring in the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. His latest book, Don't Throw Out Your Bible, is now in print.

“The whole worl’s in a terrible state of chassis.” So, with delicious malapropism, says “Captain” Jack as his dysfunctional life and family fall apart during the Irish Civil War (1922-23). Aristotle was right: history tells us what happens at a particular time and place, but fiction shows us what happens everywhere and all the time. A hundred years after O’Casey’s play – with news of the various troubles in Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, the USA, and [you fill in your own blank] – the whole world is still in a terrible state of chaos. And despite our modern rationality, technology, and councils of nations, we still seem unable to do anything substantive to correct it. Our ability to do so may very well be, as we used to say in my army days, beyond our pay grade. We do, however, construct various narratives in an attempt to make that state of chaos understandable, or at least manageable.

One of those narratives, with some significant variations, is the view of Judaism, Christianity, and later, Islam, that the events of world history move at God’s pleasure, anchored in an act of creation and leading to that other anchor point, the state of everlasting fulfilment. The Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution enhanced(?) that view by adding the notion of progress. Then Marxism came along, lopped off the two anchor points, and substituted secularist variants in which a revolution replaces the act of creation and a mythic “just society” replaces everlasting fulfilment. Meanwhile on the other side of the planet, in the absence of ideas like creation and progress, there grew up Eastern religions whose cycles of rebirth portray the universe as some sort of cosmic Blue Box, from which the soul may eventually escape into the blissful anonymity of the One. Or if none of those narratives suits you, how about Arnold Toynbee’s cynical quip that “history is just one damned thing after another”?

St Paul described the Judaeo-Christian narrative of the rise and fall of nations when he addressed the Council of the Areopagus in Athens: “ The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth . . . . gives to all men life and breath and everything. And he made from one every nation of men to live on all the face of the earth, having determined [their] allotted periods [of time] and the boundaries of their habitation, so that they should seek God, in the hope that they might feel after him and find him. Yet he is not far from each one of us, for ‘In him we live and move and have our being’. As even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are indeed his offspring’ ” (Acts 17:24-28).

The Council members would have recognized the historical details that Paul was alluding to. The then-current Roman Empire had taken over the three fragments of Alexander’s Greek Empire, which had previously conquered the Medo-Persian Empire, which before that had taken over the Babylonian Empire. Even the Roman Empire would fulfill its life cycle, followed later by the rise and fall of others like the so-called Holy Roman Empire and the Ottoman Empire. And some of us have been around long enough to watch the sun setting on our own beloved British Empire. A lecturer on the state of the American Empire reminded his audience recently that, statistically, the average duration of such empires is about 250 years. So it was not idly that the author of the epistle to the Hebrews wrote, “Here we have no lasting city, but we seek the one that is to come” (Hebrews 13:14).

Nevertheless, we do in fact go about our affairs as if we could preserve some “lasting city” in this present age. We must not have been listening when Heraclitus (500 BC) told us that this material world is at every level in a state of flux -- that you can’t step into the same river twice. What St Paul contributes to this discussion is the idea that the flux itself is not an accident. Rather, he says, the flux has a pedagogical purpose: God has determined that no nation or empire will continue indefinitely in time or geographical scope. And God has done this so that people should seek him and, hopefully, find him. The insufficiency of things is supposed to motivate us to seek the one thing that is sufficient; the impermanence of things should motivate us to seek the One who is permanent. “Here we have no lasting city, but we seek the one that is to come.”

Now, in one sense that’s enough to make us cynical about ever accomplishing anything significant “down here” because all our efforts will eventually “head south”. But some theologians would rescue us from that cynicism by pointing out that the command to “fill the earth and subdue it” (Genesis 1:18) is our “cultural mandate” — our mission statement that says we should be about the business of creating godly cultures. The fact that all such cultures will inevitably have a life-cycle does not exempt us from the mandate. Of course, the Old Testament assumes a theocracy and tells Jews how to live within that culture, and the New Testament assumes a secular, pagan, and indeed non-democratic society and tells Christians how to live within that culture. But what neither testament contemplates — correct me if I’m wrong — is a pluralistic democracy in which Christians might actually hold some power. Nor does it tell us how Christians in a democracy should vote, nor how they should govern if they attain positions of power within a democratic and secular culture: in particular, what values they should try to impose by legislation, and what not. In the past, many Christian law-makers have behaved as badly as their secular peers, and fared no better in preventing their cultures’ inevitable decline. Given the consistency of human nature, I see no reason to expect anything better in the future.

It may be that the best that best Christians can do in this age or in any age is to create godly subcultures within the existing culture, modeling our values for the world to see, and courageously speaking truth to power. We need to hear our neighbors saying again that famous line from Tertullian (200 AD): “See how these Christians love one another.” We need to let that love flow out to the secular communities in which we live. And we must continue to do so until the cycles of rise and decline have ceased and (however you may imagine it) “the kingdoms of this world have become the Kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever.”

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

This afternoon I watched the movie "Black Hawk Down", a 20+ year old docudrama on the ongoing civil (!) war in Somalia. I followed that by reading the Wiki article on same. Captain Jack could never have known just how right he was.

READER FEEDBACK

 

 

 

Arts & Opinion, a bi-monthly, is archived in the Library and Archives Canada.
ISSN 1718-2034

 

Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
MEGABLAST PODCAST with JASON McDONALD
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
SPECIAL PROMOTION: ads@artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
SUPPORT THE ARTS @ Logo approved by www.artsandopinion.com
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis