Arts &
  Arts Culture Analysis  
Vol. 21, No.4, 2022
  Current Issue  
  Back Issues  
Robert J. Lewis
  Senior Editor
Jason McDonald
  Contributing Editors
David Solway
Louis René Beres
Nick Catalano
Chris Barry
Don Dewey
Howard Richler
Jordan Adler
Andrew Hlavacek
Daniel Charchuk
  Music Editor
Serge Gamache
  Arts Editor
Lydia Schrufer
Mady Bourdage
  Photographer Jerry Prindle
Chantal Levesque
Emanuel Pordes
  Past Contributors
  Noam Chomsky
Mark Kingwell
Charles Tayler
Naomi Klein
Arundhati Roy
Evelyn Lau
Stephen Lewis
Robert Fisk
Margaret Somerville
Mona Eltahawy
Michael Moore
Julius Grey
Irshad Manji
Richard Rodriguez
Navi Pillay
Ernesto Zedillo
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Jean Baudrillard
Bill Moyers
Barbara Ehrenreich
Leon Wieseltier
Nayan Chanda
Charles Lewis
John Lavery
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
Alex Waterhouse-Hayward

cause for concern




Phyllis Chesler, Ph.D, is an Emerita Professor of Psychology and Women’s Studies at City University of New York. She is a best-selling author, a legendary feminist leader.

The jury that exculpated Johnny Depp (vs Amber Heard) reminds me that woman are as endangered as I feared we were—especially when we fight back or dare to expose male violence.

Most women are still not believed or respected; few are ever perfect enough victims. Add to that the fact that, like men, women are as close to the apes as to the angels and are capable of exaggerating and lying, capable of committing High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Add to that, that women have been exposing and fighting back against sexism and continue to face a backlash which is increasing by the second.

Also, Depp drew scads of screaming, swooning female fans. Perhaps some women just dislike other, perhaps more beautiful women and love, just love, Bad Boys. And some men may feel that Depp is their pirate gladiator who fought back on their behalf given the (unfair) humiliation levelled against all those men whom the #MeToo movement brought down or tried to bring down: Bill O’Reilly, Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Woody Allen, etc.

I did not view the Depp-Heard trial nor did I read any of the articles about it. Celebrity culture does not really interest me. I do not view most trials and such a trial as forms of entertainment. They are more often blood sports and I am not a voyeur.

What was Heard’s crime? I went back to the beginning, to her December 18, 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post. It does not mention Depp. It is a low-key, everyday feminist piece. I could find nothing inflammatory, unusual, or wrong with it—but that’s because I’m also a feminist. Heard writes:

“Like many women, I had been harassed and sexually assaulted by the time I was of college age. But I kept quiet . . . and did not see myself as a victim…Then, two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse and felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.”

Heard claims that she lost career opportunities and saw how “institutions protect men accused of abuse . . . the #MeToo movement has taught us how power like this works, not just in Hollywood but in all kinds of institutions.”

Heard argues for the re-funding of the Violence Against Women Act and points out that former President Trump “has been accused by more than a dozen women of sexual misconduct.”

Strange, Trump has also not sued her for defamation.

Heard refers to death threats and to having to change her phone number and writes that she wants to “ensure that women who come forward to talk about violence receive more support.”

I do not see how this vanilla op-ed piece led Depp to bring this lawsuit. However, people are telling me that she did, indeed, “defame” him in countless media interviews, and that he was moved to act so that his career would not be ruined and his children would not think him capable of violence against a woman. Not even when he was drunk and on drugs. Not even when Heard had photos credible enough to help her obtain a restraining order against him.

Well, she may have hit him too. Or “provoked” him—so all his female fans say.

Oh yes, many women seem to be supporting him, not her. Well, our people are known to write love letters to serial killers and run-of-the-mill murderers—and to marry some as well.

Okay. I wasn’t in the room. I haven’t read what the media ran with when Heard was allegedly defaming Depp. I haven’t read the trial transcript.

But I must ask: What kind of man would actually bring a public defamation lawsuit against his former wife? How great could her crimes have been? How much was he quick to anger/how much had she aggravated him?

Here’s how such a man sounds in a series of text messages.

“Hopefully that c—t’s rotting corpse is decomposing in f—g trunk of a honda civic.”

In another text, Depp fantasized about having sex with Heard’s “burnt corpse” to make sure she was dead.

Finally, Depp wrote that Heard was “begging for total global humiliation. She’s gonna get it.”

He also referred to Heard as an “overused flappy fish market.”

What a nice guy.

Perhaps justice was served by this verdict. But here’s what puzzles me. Heard’s article is, as I’ve noted, entirely vanilla and does not name Depp. Apparently, journalists around the world kept asking Heard about Depp and she kept saying whatever she said. (I admit it: I have not read or seen any of this).

If the media truly defamed Depp, if they quoted Heard without checking out the facts and/or without getting Depp’s side, I must ask: Why hasn’t Depp sued the media? Oh, he did—but he lost against the Sun. But the media apparently chose to keep quoting Heard about the Depp. And We, the People ate it all up, gossip sold the rags. And now this never-ending trial has sold more rags.

One cannot generalize based on single trial. Perhaps justice really was served.

And yet—consider the moment in which we find ourselves. Very few “real” rape cases are ever prosecuted. Incest—rarely. Domestic violence—a bit more than before but far, far from having been abolished. Pornography and prostitution in which women are “holes,” and/or “ho’s” have only increased exponentially. Many of the poorest American women are about to lose abortion. We are not even referred to as “women” anymore. Gender identity speech codes increasingly demand that we be referred to as “menstruating people” or, in terms of surrogacy, as “breeders” or “surrogate uteruses.”

Despite some real progress for some women; despite the ways in which feminist ideas and ideals have travelled globally; I still fear that all women are now facing what always was—as well as an ugly backlash.




Comment: You didn't watch the trial, so don't opine on what it means, thank you. Allow me, someone who DID watch the trial, tell you what happened: deeply disturbed woman was exposed as an abuser and liar. Abuse victims everywhere, men and women alike, celebrated the victim's vindication.

As a woman who was abused by another woman, I can tell you Amber Heard is one of a type. There are thousands, probably millions of women who have been the victim of their own Amber Heard: girlfriends, mothers, sisters, frenemies, employers. Yet others have said that Heard reminds them of their male abusers, that abusive behavior isn't exclusive to one gender. You're telling us that we're stupid, self-hating, easily fooled by social media--I'm telling you that you're ignorant, arrogant, and easily fooled by mainstream media.

The backlash against Amber Heard is because she lied, and kept lying, and we watched her lie. As for the UK trial, that one is dubious: the judge had conflicts of interest, excluded much of Depp's evidence, and allowed hearsay evidence in Heard's favor. Judge Azcarate herself (another self-hating woman, I presume?) commented that she thought it was basically a sham

Watch the trial, it's free online without commentary. Check out the Australia audio of Amber stomping around in heels (she testified she had walked over broken glass in her bare feet that night), admitting she was high on several substances, and tearfully apologizing and explaining she didn't mean to hurt Depp so badly.

You're a professor? Rule number one, dipshit, is do the research. God, you make me embarrassed to be a college-educated feminist

Another "feminist" without empathy for men. Looking only through a lens of labels and victimization.

This is just so sad! She says multiple times that she hasn’t watched the case or read the transcript, hasn’t read articles about it and hasn’t followed it in the media over the years. Why would your completely uninformed opinion be relevant then?? As a feminist, EVERYONE should be allowed to have an informed opinion and it doesn’t have to be uniform. Being a feminist doesn’t mean agreeing with all women and siding against men no matter what. This type of article is such a bummer.

"I did not view the Depp-Heard trial nor did I read any of the articles about it."So, admitedly she knows absolutely nothing about this issue, but can't resist sharing her uninformed opinion. Why do people like this exist?

I couldn't read past the first paragraph. I really hate that people are making this about misogynistic issues and not the truth. It's making women and feminists look f-cking stupid.

It's about the truth of these two people. It's not a statement about the world as we know it. It's one man, who happens to be a celebrity fighting back against the lies of a woman, also a celebrity, who happens to have a severe personality disorder.

Will it have other implications? Maybe. Some of those might be great changes though, not negative ones. Maybe people will recognize toxic relationships. Maybe men will come forward with their abuse. Maybe people won't accept a tweet as fact. All positives if you ask me. Accusations of this magnitude SHOULD stand up to scrutiny, especially by a JURY. It's not easy to meet that burden and he did. That's huge. I honestly didn't think he had any hope of winning.

At the end of the day, no one should have to lose their career or their reputation based on an unverifiable claim made in the public eye. AH made this public, not Depp. She chose this road. She didn't have to, but she did. I'm sorry, but I don't think he had any other options here, regardless of what it does to anyone else.

Not seeing women as complete humans with agency and with the capability to do both good and bad things is misogynist. And that's what this writer does.

Ignorant post from an ignorant person who was ignorant about the trial and is idiotic enough to fall for gaslighting of such an obvious bullshitter

So, you admittedly know absolutely none of the facts, and yet here you are, sharing your completely uninformed opinion. That's absolutely amazing to me.


By Phyllis Chesler
Remember the Taliban
The Writing Life
Transgender Bending
Femicide: A Form of Honour Killing
Secular Islam on the Rise








Arts & Opinion, a bi-monthly, is archived in the Library and Archives Canada.
ISSN 1718-2034


Comedy Podcast with Jess Salomon and Eman El-Husseini
Bahamas Relief Fund
Film Ratings at Arts & Opinion - Montreal
fashion,brenda by Liz Hodson
Festival Nouveau Cinema de Montreal(514) 844-2172
Lynda Renée: Chroniques Québécois - Blog
Montreal Guitar Show July 2-4th (Sylvain Luc etc.). border=
Photo by David Lieber:
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis