Arts &
  Arts Culture Analysis  
Vol. 7, No. 2, 2008
  Current Issue  
  Back Issues  
Robert J. Lewis
  Senior Editor
Mark Goldfarb
  Contributing Editors
Bernard Dubé
Sylvain Richard
Robert Rotondo
Marissa Consiglieri de Chackal
  Music Editors
Diane Gordon
Serge Gamache
  Arts Editor
Lydia Schrufer
Mady Bourdage
Marcel Dubois
Emanuel Pordes
  Past Contributors
  Noam Chomsky
Mark Kingwell
Naomi Klein
Arundhati Roy
Evelyn Lau
Stephen Lewis
Robert Fisk
Margaret Somverville
David Solway
Michael Moore
Julius Grey
Irshad Manji
Richard Rodriguez
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Jean Baudrillard
Bill Moyers
Barbara Ehrenreich
Leon Wieseltier
Charles Lewis
John Lavery
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
Alex Waterhouse-Hayward

responding to Abstract Art Isn't Art by Robert J. Lewis
I love how the people going against the author are saying simple, almost childish comebacks, like "you're wrong", "you're simple minded", "you have no idea what its all about", without actually giving a concrete form of rebuttal; almost as if they're bigotting themselves by further emphasizing the lack of creativity, concreteness, and objectivity in abstract art. It is sad that these people believe that their work has any meaning. They could honestly learn to actually draw or paint, like say a tree in an empty field would have been a lot more brain-working than just a slab of paint or a streak of pee onto a canvas. Tell me I'm wrong, boys.
Master artists and painters of the highest order are high level souls that are accomplishing their final practice and rehearsals in arts in order to move forward to a far sophisticated artistic experience; is contributing in the creation of the nature on earth …

By injecting and forcing “Abstract practices” on earth is a part of the devilish plan to destroy the planet earth or in other words delaying planet earth progress toward a higher degree of development by vanishing the visual art and natural drawing talents, so by the time earth will look like "Abstract Arts."

On the other hand Abstract Arts considered being one of the best candidates for money laundry and bribery serving the dominating practices on Earth now days.

Pressure and stress, health problems on earth is mainly due to the selfishness energy that is dominating Earth, that makes lots of art lovers switched to “Abstract Drawings” it gives a sort of energy relieve and it requires only a simple study on how to match colors or simply they can cheat color matching from the nature using the exact colors with respect to proportions like looking to a colorful bird and cheat his patterns and color mixing into a stretched canvas or any painting material.

I wish I can help and contribute in presenting a better Art model that makes the current model obsolete. Please let me know what kind of activities I can join and Help.

Sorry for my poor English writings, I did my best to describe what I know.

Mohamed Tawfik
from: Cairo – Egypt
Hello. I myself am working on a painting but as an known artist I feel no matter how grand or beautiful my art work is it will be worthless, now Jackson Pollack for instance will draw three lines on a canvas and it will reach millions of dollars in the Christie's auction house by looking around the art markets today I get very discouraged to start at all as I feel my work will be for nothing and years lost I appreciate the detail of the old masters eg, William-Adolphe Bouguereau.
It just makes me angry that this beautiful detail will be lost one day and left only in museums as a memory even in architecture this abstract form is reshaping our society ,are we becoming more intelligent or are we going backwards Rothko's orange on canvas went for tens of millions of dollars I guess we have to except every form of art work and different cultures but I believe that we shouldn't reject the beauty of natural painting and not to lessen its value.

from Lydia Schrufer, Arts Editor
As Arts Editor of Arts & Opinion, I want to put on the record my disagreement with my editor and author of the essay "Abstract Art Isn’t Art." I find his views uninformed, if not ignorant, and at best, very narrow minded. If he were to pick up a brush, he would discover just how difficult it is to produce an abstract painting he assumes himself capable of. I will grant that there is a great deal of pseudo, bad art on the market, but a blanket statement isn't helpful.

He goes on to suggest that Newman, Gaucher, Molinari et al, spent their entire careers pulling the wool over the public’s eye, that they were not interested in advancing a new concept and shaking up the status quo.

Looking at Lewis’s argument from the perspective of music, one could make the same blanket statement about contemporary jazz which many people consider noise. There’s much in music between Cage and Marsalis that listeners find offensive, but these artists felt compelled to push the envelope despite public opinion. Artists have always been driven by the zeitgeist of their environments; at times their creative efforts succeed, sometimes not, but it's important to applaud their efforts. I am not against honest criticism, but it should be educated and authoritative. The fact of the matter is that most museum and gallery visitors spend mere seconds in front of a works before passing judgment, and usually in front of works that are traditional. They then take their habits of viewing to more complex, demanding works and are disappointed. Before one can develop an appreciation of complex music, one must listen and listen again; the same applies to the visual arts.

And let’s not forget that the impressionists were the pariahs of their time and now we revere their bravado and innovation.

from Neila Mezynski:
Having painted abstractly for 18 years I have some energy on the subject. The Eastern painters give as much importance to what is not on the canvas as to what is, some Zen philosophy there, I suppose. The painter’s choices are defining and revealing. What is on the canvas and what is not is all about the individual’s life experiences and how he wants to “discuss” it through his work. The hard core abstract painter spends years developing a “language”, if you will, and sometimes that language is in the form of drips and dabs and marks, mixed media, collage, you name it. The most surprising thing is that the painter is looking for something that only he/she can recognize as working or making sense. Robert Motherwell, a great abstract painter of the 20th century, called it “the shock of recognition.” If one is going to dismiss this sophisticated and intelligent painter’s entire body of work as nothing, or not art then I guess you would have to dismiss the whole person and the whole movement of modernism. Warhol and Duchamp rattled our cages and knocked “art” off its gold encrusted pedestal and showed us that great art is not any one thing. That would be too easy!
Any argument that relies on an appeal to a definition's self-evidence is begging the question. Art is not self-evident, which is the entire point of much abstract art: attempting to discover the answer through experimentation. Difficulty or skill is irrelevant, and you have the burden of proof to establish that it is.
Crock of shit. No talent, a poser and a bum.
Who are you and what scholarly backup do you have to be able to say such ignorant things?
Abstract art is not real art, to me it's considered childlike and more like a background to a soon to be awesome piece but its missing the actual painting.
You are joking I hope. Otherwise you need help.





 = shared webhosting, dedicated servers, development/consulting, no down time/top security, exceptional prices
Couleur JAZZ 91.9
Couleur JAZZ 91.9
Montreal World Film Festival
2007 Millennium Summit, Montreal, Nov. 8-9, info =  1.866.515.5009
Care + Net Computer Services
E-Tango: Web Design and lowest rates for web hosting
Armand Vaillancourt: sculptor
Available Ad Space
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis